Francesco

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Table API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco shared this idea  · 
  2. 300 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco shared this idea  · 
  4. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Backup » PaaS Backup  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco shared this idea  · 
  5. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. 1,072 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

  7. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco commented  · 

    Hi Richard,

    It's my understanding that if you perform an OR query using both partition and row keys as you described the indexs are used to retrieve the data and there is no table scan.

    However if one of the partition keys is stored on a different server then you'll get a continuation token returned which you will need to traverse to get the rest of the data requested.

    If this is the case are you requesting that azure queries traverse the continuation for us automatically?

  8. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco supported this idea  · 
  9. 82 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco commented  · 

    Would it be possible to remove all account and table limits and only place a transaction limit of entities/second per PartitionKey?

    If data with the same partition key generally resides on the same physical server where physical technical limits exist then wouldn't this be the best place to impose a transactional limit?

    Francesco supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,679 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,383 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    83 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Francesco supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base