Dimka M

My feedback

  1. 2,191 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      71 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.

      For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

      Dimka M commented  · 

      +1 on case sensitivity

      Dimka M commented  · 

      It's great that static website hosting is now available. But seems like custom domains with custom ssl certificate are still no go (except through CDN). Come on!

      Dimka M supported this idea  · 
    • 4,214 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        127 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

        You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

        Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

        Dimka M commented  · 

        It's been a year since last admin response. Come on!

        Dimka M commented  · 

        Looks like this feature will have to come in hand-in-hand with static website hosting feature (https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217298-storage/suggestions/6417741-static-website-hosting-in-azure-blob-storage#{toggle_previous_statuses}). Admin, any update on either of these?

        Dimka M commented  · 

        It's been 5 years since this idea was created!!!

        Dimka M commented  · 

        Dear Storage Team,
        This is getting ridiculous. Please implement >:(

        Dimka M commented  · 

        I second the SAS link issue. This is NOT "completed".

        Dimka M commented  · 

        Let's get this done, come on already!

        Dimka M supported this idea  · 
        Dimka M commented  · 

        This is so sorely needed!

      • 493 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          4 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Dimka M commented  · 

          Any update on this?

          Dimka M supported this idea  · 
        • 340 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            45 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

            Hi all,

            This will be available this calendar year.

            I want to clarify that it is not planned as a separate binding, but rather as a core capability that applies to all bindings. This means that all secrets used for binding configuration (and any others, too) can be sourced from Key Vault. The design involves the app setting value being a reference to a secret in Key Vault, so all you would need to do is make a change to App Settings. The platform will use the managed identity of the application to resolve the secret and make it available to code. The initial release will require secret versions to be explicitly defined, but we are hoping to develop automatic rotation semantics for future updates.

            Thanks to everyone for all of the active discussion here. We understand this is an incredibly important and long-anticipated feature, and we’re really looking forward…

            Dimka M commented  · 

            Still need this.

            Dimka M supported this idea  · 
            Dimka M commented  · 

            This is really needed. More importantly a caching mechanism is required so that keyvault does not get overwhelmed with requests when function infinitely scales. (see discussion here: https://github.com/Azure/azure-webjobs-sdk/issues/746)

          • 179 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              23 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              Dimka M supported this idea  · 
            • 3,135 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                121 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                Renaming resource groups is treated like a resource move behind the scenes. We will address this feature request once resource move is broadly supported across the various services. We would not want to release a rename feature where some resources ended up in the “renamed” resource group, while others were left behind.

                Dimka M supported this idea  · 
              • 50 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  4 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                  Moving this to unplanned to better reflect status. The previous update hasn’t changed, but since the work is on the Event Grid/SQL teams and we’re not planning on building a custom binding ourselves, this is unplanned.

                  —Colby

                  Dimka M shared this idea  · 

                Feedback and Knowledge Base