Greg

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » VMSS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  2. 302 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Greg commented  · 

    My situation doesn't lend itself well to the solution mentioned in the Jul 31 response from ADMIN (see my other comments on the github issue). Managing it outside of a template is easier at this point, but it wouldn't be easier if I could deploy a VNET and it's properties without having to specify all subnets.

    Subnets can be deployed individually, but not a VNET. Is there a good reason it is not like other resources with parent/child relationships (app service plans and web apps, azure SQL servers and databases, etc...)?

    Greg shared this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  5. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » Bug  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  8. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  9. 107 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  10. 141 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  10 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  11. 170 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  12. 88 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  13. 53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Automation » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg shared this idea  · 
  15. 409 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  16. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Pack » Service Management Automation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Thanks for the feedback on this. We can investigate adding this functionality.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  17. 378 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  18. 4,840 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    158 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Greg supported this idea  · 
  19. 126 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,218 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    49 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Greg supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base