Jeff Bryant
My feedback
-
10 votesJeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
37 votes
We’ve done some improvements around grouping, including dynamic Azure queries (tag-based) and dynamic saved searches. We’re also still investigating other higher level groupings.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
If we allowed the ability to edit existing schedules, would that be good enough? https://feedback.azure.com/forums/905242/suggestions/16630993
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteJeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesJeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteJeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Bryant
commented
Even better... after creating a group in SM, have the ability to create a NPM monitor between the subnets. If there are 3 subnets, create 2 monitors with the middle tier subnet being the common one with a link to either front or backend tier.
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
23 votes
We are working designs for ways to filter which processes and connections are shown. In addition, yesterday we checked in a feature that should enable you to show a map for domain controllers. First, we are now grouping connections to machines without an agent by port. This provides a more useful view where you can see all the connections to a given port, and it simplifies the map as we don’t draw a node for each individual back-end connection.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Bryant
commented
Would like the ability to filter by a process and then filter by failed connections
Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
The circled field is number of computers missing any critical updates, e.g. there are six computers which haven’t been patched.
The underlined fields are the numbers of patches missing on those computers. So computer one is missing a total of 47 critical patches, computer two is missing a total of 9 critical patches, etc.Leaving this as “needs feedback” until we can confirm it’s by design.
Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Bryant
commented
Here is a screen shot of the problem. https://1drv.ms/i/s!AvOoIMtj8peSuPo70oUMLf-9DaD8XQ
As you can see, the tile has incorrect values.
-
12 votes
We respect machine settings, so if you follow the instructions here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/automation/automation-update-management#enable-updates-for-other-microsoft-products you will be able to achieve this.
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
-
170 votes
Hey folks,
It’s been a while since I’ve updated this space.
Performance is a high priority for all new and existing feature in the Azure Portal, and we’re constantly assessing all experiences to ensure they meet your expectations.
If anyone experiences any specific Portal performance issues please feel free to open new items, reach out to myself directly (sewatson@microsoft.com), or leave comments for those scenarios. We’d happily investigate them further.
Cheers,
Sean.Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Thanks again for the feedback! We currently have a feature in the backlog that allows you to create a VM with an attached disk at the same time. We still need to prioritize it, so there is no ETA at this point of time. If you want to see it sooner, please don’t hesitate to vote this idea!
Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thanks for submitting this. We will investigate.
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesunder review · 1 comment · Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » Search UI and Language · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Makes sense. We can look into better ways to handle this.
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes1 comment · Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » Search UI and Language · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes0 comments · Azure Monitor-Log Analytics » Search UI and Language · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the feedback.
Jeff Bryant
shared this idea
·
-
248 votes
AAD currently requires a strict directory scoping. We can investigate options if this is a popular request.
Jeff Bryant
supported this idea
·
I would like to see groups based on tags first, then the ability to import groups from SCCM.