Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in other Azure services, SaaS products, and on-premises systems. With Azure Functions, your applications scale based on demand and you pay only for the resources you consume. Azure Functions provides an intuitive, browser-based user interface allowing you to create scheduled or triggered pieces of code implemented in a variety of programming languages.

How can we improve Microsoft Azure Functions?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Support for blob trigger on entire storage account

    Microsoft’s mobile services are designed to place blobs that are pushed in from mobile clients into many containers - a separate container for each entity that the files are associated with. Microsoft’s solution for sourcing events from blob operations is not compatible with this, as the existing blob trigger required you to know the name of the container at setup/binding time. It would be useful to have a blob trigger that can monitor an entire storage account.

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Changing this and clarifying. You can do this today with the Event Grid trigger (e.g. create an event grid trigger and then add subscriptions for each container in a storage account – or many storage accounts – and point to same function). That’s the way that works today and is planned to be the solution for this short term. However leaving this open as I think it was more general to have the Blob and not the Event Grid trigger do this. Keep the votes coming and comment on if Event Grid may not be enough.

    -
    Jeff

  2. Process isolation within the same Function App

    It would be beneficial to be able to run multiple functions from different Function App Projects in the same Azure Function App. Why? For simplicity purposes. It would be unmanageable to create so many Azure Functional Apps for each function when they don't really belong in the same project. Versioning of external references is one reason to have isolation.

    Since you are already hosted in Azure App Service, you could leverage Virtual Directories as a mechanism for Isolation.

    More details here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47705029/can-we-have-two-separate-bin-folders-within-a-single-function-app

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. search and replace in proxy response body.

    Provide a way to replace all occurences of a string within the response body received from the backend with another.

    Would be used to any embedded URLs refering to the backend with ones referring to the proxy

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Proxies  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Quartz Timer Feature

    Please enhance Azure Functions or Azure in general that exposes an API against which we can post quartz like timer jobs.

    Would be great to set a timer in Azure that can eventually trigger an Azure Function when executing.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Profiler support for .Net Core Azure Functions

    I would like to be able to profile a .Net Core Azure Function such that I can see a breakdown of how long each method invocation takes within the call stack so I can optimise any bottlenecks.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Azure Function C# template to use nameof() and appropriate function name

    How about change C# template like below form?

    [FunctionName(nameof(HttpTriggerCSharp))
    public static ...HttpTriggerCSharp(...)
    {
    ...
    }

    I think all of functions name has Run() might not reasonable. and utilize nameof() could be very helpful to change function name and readibility

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Azure B2C Trigger

    It would be really helpful to be able to have triggers on Azure B2C, for example on new user added take some action etc.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Add binding attribute to control function scaling

    We use azure functions extensively. One of the issues we have is not being able to control individual functions scaling. I am not talking bout the function app here, but the functions themselves.

    Using the new attribute binding system could be a very nice way to set the max number of instances a function can spawn.
    [MaxParallelExecution(5)] or something like that.

    this would make it so that particular function does not scale over 5 instances.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Renaming functions using the web UI

    Renaming an Azure function doesn’t seem to be easily possible using the web interface. It would be helpful if the user could:
    - right-click the function name and choose a rename option in a context menu
    - use the “Manage” submenu (which already allows to delete a function)

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Want to be able to enable Application Insights via the azure cli when creating a function without having to rely on an ARM template.

    I want to be able to enable Application Insights via the azure cli when creating a function without having to rely on an ARM template. It seems like all you should have to do is have an option to say enable it and an option to state location information.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Visual Studio extension for Azure functions should not be mutually exclusive with the Azure portal

    It seems that when an Azure function is created in Visual Studio, it can't be modified in the Azure portal. Also, several features seem to be missing from Visual Studio (for example, where is the equivalent to the "Integrate" tab?).

    It should be possible to:
    - Create an Azure function in the Azure portal and import it as a project in Visual Studio
    - Start an Azure function in Visual Studio, deploy it, then make additional modifications on the Azure portal, for features that are not yet available in Visual Studio (for example using the "Integrate" tab)

    Eventually, everything that…

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Currently for performance reasons we publish functions from local tools as a compressed zip and run it as such. This means it’s an immutable artifact. The recommended path is to make changes and edit from local tools so you can continue to take advantage of the performance improvements of running from package.

  12. Device Twin Trigger from IoT Hub

    Add a trigger when a chance occurs in the IoT Hub device twin

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Sync code from blob storage

    I find the current deployment model way too difficult to work with. Please consider supporting auto-sync from blob storage, similar to what aws lambda offers.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Output to Service Bus Queues Dynamically

    I have an Azure Function that binds to an input Event Hub and an output Service Bus Namespace. The output binding accepts the name of a queue. However, the event data coming from the Event Hub can potentially go to different queues. The determinant is in the message data. It would be nice to be able to tokenize the queue destination based on event data coming from the Event Hub

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Address Azure Functions Resiliency Weakness to Azure Service DNS issues

    Azure DNS issue R50C-5RZ caused multiple core Azure function triggers to fail across our subscriptions due to loss of access to Storage Accounts.

    The DNS issue made all our storage accounts temporarily unresolvable by DNS and because of the tight coupling with Azure functions, function triggers failed due to the inability to resolve storage account urls but did not recover when the DNS issue was corrected.

    There were some Socketexception / 'remote host not found' errors logged in App insights but seemed to be no way to know that the trigger was in a failed state (unless a build up…

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is an awesome idea!
    We’re very unlikely to be able to reduce our dependency on DNS, but we can generally handle failing triggers more gracefully.

    “Handle temporary loss of a storage account without requiring a manual restart” is a scenario we’re targeting.

    Keep the feedback coming!
    Alex

  16. Move from Python 3.6 to Python 3.7 for Azure Functions v2

    On python.org, the release notes for the latest 3.6.8 release state:

    Python 3.6.8 is planned to be the last bugfix release for 3.6.x. Following the release of 3.6.8, we plan to provide security fixes for Python 3.6 as needed through 2021, five years following its initial release.

    It seems weird to choose a Python version branch for Azure Functions that will not receive any more bugfix releases ever.

    Can the Python version be bumped to 3.7 to fix that?

    Thanks,

    Tobias Weisserth

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Fine grained function billing please

    Please add a more fine grained billing please.

    A minimum execution of 100 ms and 128 MB is to coarse. A lot of my functions execute within 10ms or less and use less than 128 MB of RAM.

    Please add more fine grained executions possible (10ms or even per ms) and in smaller memory steps, maybe 16 or 32 MB.

    Also make async execution time not count toward function execution time, because if is often not in our control (waiting for an slow external service, database or slow response writing because the caller of the Azure Function has a very…

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Allow running for greater than 10 minutes on a Consumption plan

    The current limit of 10 minutes is not viable for some processing scenarios we have. We cannot use Durable Functions to solve our processing needs either. We simply need more time. Let us configure a longer timeout than 10 minutes and pay you for the run time. :)

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. ruby

    Support ruby please!!!

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Azure auth populate request.user

    When using the azure auth over functions, specifically those that take a http trigger, it would be great if it would populate the request.user in a similar way you can do using node.js and passport (https://github.com/Azure-Samples/active-directory-b2c-javascript-nodejs-webapi/blob/master/index.js) rather than just providing some headers.

    This would make it much easier to work with authenticated users and interact with their information

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Azure Functions

Feedback and Knowledge Base