Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in other Azure services, SaaS products, and on-premises systems. With Azure Functions, your applications scale based on demand and you pay only for the resources you consume. Azure Functions provides an intuitive, browser-based user interface allowing you to create scheduled or triggered pieces of code implemented in a variety of programming languages.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Support for Azure Managed Service Identities in EventHub (and other) triggers

    In Event Hub, I can add my Function App's MSI as a data reader, but in the function I cannot use trigger bindings to read from the queue without using a SecureAccess Key. We are trying to go password free wherever possible, and Azure has been promoting this course of action, so why do we need secret keys for reading from the queue? It then forces us to create and share a secret key for partner teams to read from our queue, rather than just permissioning them in Event Hub.

    84 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Support for native Rust Azure Functions

    As of February 2019, Azure Functions support native .NET, JavaScript and Python.

    Could we please have native support to run Azure Functions written in Rust? To host Rust functions currently we have to pay for a Linux App Service plan and embed our functions within a Docker container. This is expensive just to run a few microservices written in Rust.

    Peter Huene has an excellent project for anyone interest in writing Azure Functions in Rust....

    https://github.com/peterhuene/azure-functions-rs

    188 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. vnet integration

    function app and web app cloning

    When cloning apps and adding it to a different ASP you need to add conditions or checks whether the app is vnet integrated and not allow the cloning. This breaks the destination ASPs network configuration and none of the existing apps be able to communicate or function properly.

    10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Update Azure Functions sandbox to include Visual FoxPro OLE DB provider

    Hi guys

    Trying a real blending of old Microsoft and new Microsoft and have encountered a a problem!

    I'm trying to read a Visual FoxPro DB from within an Azure Function, but unfortunately the Visual FoxPro OLE DB driver is not installed on function machines.

    The driver is available from Microsoft here - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=14839.

    It should be as simple as to copy the vfpoledb.dll file into the D:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\System\Ole DB\ directory along with the other OLE DB drivers that are currently included. I have tried to do this myself through the Kudu console but don't have permissions…

    10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Julia lang support for Azure Functions

    With Julia lang reaching v1.0 last year, it is emerging as a force in machine learning and other scientific computing applications,

    https://juliacomputing.com/case-studies/

    In particular, BlackRock's Aladdin, Conning Asset Management, and Aviva are all using Julia for financial risk modeling and I see a great opportunity for Julia to impact finance among other things. I'd love to be able to use Julia in Azure Functions for my fintech startup.

    38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  3 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Reduce the price of Premium instances

    I could run a VM that costs me much less for the same configuration. To me, the price for pre-warmed instances seems too high.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Client cert authentication support in Azure functions

    the ability to support mutual authentication with client certs. Today the only way to do this is built it into your functions
    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49686316/azure-functions-configure-client-certificate-authentication
    it would be great to have this as a feature of the platform.

    you could compare this lack of functionality to the something like Kubernetes ingress controller that easily allows you to do mutual auth https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/tree/master/docs/examples/auth/client-certs

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. @EventhubOutPut supporting Partitionkey

    Currently its not clear from the document whether @EventHubOutPut supports a partitionKey to write the events. There is no examples for java. Can the below document be updated ?

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-bindings-event-hubs#trigger---event-metadata

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Can we test azure http trigger with API_KEY locally?

    I am creating some http triggers and want to know if we can create API_KEY locally to simulate the actions.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Please consider defaulting the task hub name to the site name in Durable functions1.0 to avoid the storage conflict.

    Please consider defaulting the task hub name to the site name in Durable functions1.0 to avoid the storage conflict.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can do this today by setting the hubName to WEBSITE_SITE_NAME in host.json. It should work in both V1 and V2 of Durable Functions. (NOTE: it should be WEBSITE_SITE_NAME surrounded in percent signs, user voice may not be displaying the percent signs properly) – Anthony

  11. Dynamic file names for Blob out bindings - Python

    I am currently workig with an HTTP trigger with some paramateres. Based on those parameters I do some calculations and save results into a file on blob storage account. Currently I am saving them in static file name defined on binding but I woul dlike to be able to generate dynamically the file name in the az func code.

    For example:

    {

      "type": "blob",
    
    "direction": "out",
    "name": "outputBlob",
    "path": "container/{calculatedFileName}.csv",
    "connection": "AzureWebJobsStorage"
    }

    where calculatedFileName is something we define in the code.

    Is that something feasible? I am using Python.

    Thanks in advanced.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Add Elastic Scale Plan (pre-warmed instances) in Gov Cloud

    When auto-scaling the number of instances for a Function, API requests are routed to new instances before they are ready (warmed up) causing failures/timeouts for those requests. In regular cloud, this is solved by using the Elastic Scale consumption plan that lets you specify the number of pre-warmed instances (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-premium-plan#pre-warmed-instances). Please bring this same plan to Gov Cloud.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Add C++ support for Azure Functions

    Allow C++ binaries to contains Azure Functions. It could be done by invoking the main in an executable, or a DLL with a specific export method with predefined signature.

    C++ allows to control memory usage and allow users to be incredibly fast when used properly. In an environment where scaling is needed, squeezing a few seconds of CPU or lowering a few KB of RAM can translate to hundreds or thousands of dollars in savings.

    If memory leaks are a concern, putting aside the fact that C# code can also leak, you could create fail safes for Azure Functions. A…

    43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Specify a custom window for platform updates to WebApps, Functions, etc.

    I want to be able to request platform upgrades only restart my site within a specific window, say outside of business hours.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is great feedback.
    We strive for platform upgrades to happen transparently to you, however, they will restart every worker for your function app while performing a platform upgrade.

    We do not currently have the infrastructure to make this publicly available, but keep the votes coming!

    Thanks!
    Alex
    Azure Functions Team!

  15. Please eliminate sandbox restrictions while running in Docker

    Right now the sandbox applies to azure function apps even when they're running in docker. Docker is the sandbox in that case. Further, things like System.Drawing.Common aren't effected on Linux the same as they are on Windows so there should be no issue requiring the sandbox to interfere.

    So Azure Functions should disable the sand-boxing when running in docker entirely.

    Failing that, it should disable the System.Drawing.Common limitations if running on Linux.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  1 comment  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. dynamic "newBatchThreshold" on queue triggered functions.

    When i host a queue triggered azure function on an app service, i would like the ability to programatically alter "newBatchThreshold" for a queue triggered function at runtime.
    So that when extraordinary conditions occur, i can decrease the number of messages causing stress on the system.

    I have many messages passing through a queue triggered function. Most of the time they are easy to process, so i have "newBatchThreshold" set to 64.

    This normally causes 20-30% database load processing these messages.

    We recently processed a batch of data where the messages all caused a substantially more complex than normal workflow…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Allow running headless Chrome (or other browser) in Function apps or Web apps

    Basically it's this:
    https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/introducing-headless-chrome-support-in-cloud-functions-and-app-engine

    Now obviously Google has a bit of an advantage here what with Chrome being their own tech but there are so many blogs out there with people talking about complicated Docker solutions just to run headless Chrome in the cloud.

    It would be great if we could get a solution where we could run Puppeteer in much the same way, or allow web apps to run Chrome without having to be inside Docker and we could manage a pool of Chromes without having to manage Docker as well.

    60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Headless Chrome requires some libraries to be installed that aren’t available in the containers we use in Linux consumption. You can, however, run your function app in a Docker container with the libraries installed. Custom containers are currently supported in the Premium and App Service plans. Take a look at this example from a community member of a Dockerfile with the dependencies: https://github.com/estruyf/azure-function-node-puppeteer/blob/master/Dockerfile

    - Anthony

  18. Ability to schedule Azure function runtime updates from the portal

    Requesting the ability to be able to schedule Azure function runtime updates from the portal. At present the runtime updates are pushed by Microsoft at random times which could impact service availability and customer experience. We need the ability to be able to either define a schedule for the function runtime updates or be able to manually perform those updates at a time that is convenient to the customer.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Add support to Circuit breaker pattern

    Azure functions should control the way the comunicate with their dependencies and process each request if they have condititions to do that. Same way we define bindings, it could be possible to define circuit breaker strategy to not overload unnecessary process if it is not possible to process requests.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Allow moving from AppServicePlan to Consumption plan (in Azure portal)

    It should be easy to move between hosting plans for Azure functions so we can change this based on the current needs. At the moment, I would like to move away from app service plan for a lot of functions (use consumption plan instead), but in the future, high continous demand might move some back to an app service plan. Changing between the to modes should be as easy as scaling out on an app service plan

    I have read somewhere that there is a problem if a function was created as an app service plan because of missing storage.…

    17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5
  • Don't see your idea?

Azure Functions

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base