Allow easy donation of unused CPU cycles to cancer research, Folding@home, etc.
I would like to easily 'donate' my unused CPU cycles towards a good cause, such as cancer research within the Folding@home project.
Ideally this setting would be incorporated into the config of my worker roles, or within the Windows Azure portal.
mike brown commented
Loan, funding, 100% financing for your deals!
LOW INTEREST RATES
Rates as low as 3%! 0% interest rates for the first 6 months
Do not need to leverage any assets to acquire capital
Funds can be used same as cash.
FUNDING IN AS LITTLE AS 15 DAYS
Quick approval process
We don’t charge for submitting an application, we are paid solely on results.
NO INCOME VERIFICATION
Stated income only
Contact us today via email. email@example.com
I like the idea , costly though.
Ian Green commented
i prefer to keep my VM on idle in case real work surfaces
Thiago Custodio commented
What about use this same idea to allow something close to AWS Spot Instances?
Ondřej Sojka commented
Do not. Let the users decide to run BOINC on their own VMs (I do it on my MSDN subscription at the end of the month)
TONYA LYNN HARRELSON GARCIA commented
apcon product commented
Maybe this is a good idea.
Notice there's no way to down vote...
Nicolas Dorier commented
Please don't do that, except if the one that donate pay for it from his pocket.
Bad idea as it will increase costs and reduce performance.
No, please don't do that. This will slow everyone else down.
Mike Durkee commented
I DO NOT AGREE TO DONATION OF UNUSED CPU CYCLES.
I CLICK TO CLOSE A BUBBLE WINDOWS THAT "ALWAYS" ASK
IF I WANT TO DONATE TIME. IT POP UP AGAIN SAYING, "THANK-YOU FOR DONATING TIME. I'M UPSET. PLEASE ENSURE THAT MY COMPUTER IS NOT DONATING TIME TO ANYONE!
I WILL BE WAITING FOR YOUR QUICK REPLY TO MY EMAIL.
I completely agree with Carl. While this idea sounds good on the surface, it would really end up increasing Microsoft costs of running the service resulting in higher prices. People are already complaining about Azure prices being too high. If you want to donate "unused CPU cycles", then install that stuff on your own computers and leave them running 24 hours a day.
Carl Hörberg commented
I think it's a bad idea, you loose all the benefits of VPS, less clients can share a computer, more heat will be generated, more electricity will be consumed etc. all ending up with higher prices.
Steven Nagy commented
I think this is a great idea.
MSFT is offering free training, and 2 weeks of free compute for Folding@home here: http://distributed.cloudapp.net/
Thanks for the information Joannes! I didn't know that there were plans to create smaller VM's... which would actually pose a challenge to what I came up with.
Well I was pleasantly suprised to see that Microsoft and the NSF are offering US-based Scientists 3 years of free access to Windows Azure. This announcement carries the intent of what I was hoping for, but without the complication of distributed computing.
Lets hope that this becomes a positive synergy, and carries onto year 4 and beyond.
Joannes Vermorel commented
Looks kinda weird to me, because MS will be providing (at some point) scaled down hosting unit - smaller VMs or GAE like hosting. Cloud computing aims to really match the processing power with the allocated resources. The fact that a single worker can be vastly underused is just an artifact caused my the lack of small hosting unit.
A discussion on this topic at MSDN forums:
Another alternative is: Rosetta@home http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/