(General Feedback)

Do you have an idea or suggestion based on your experience with Azure? We would love to hear it! Please take a few minutes to submit your idea in the one of the forums available on the right or vote up an idea submitted by another Azure customer. All of the feedback you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building Azure.

This forum (General Feedback) is used for any broad feedback related to Azure. If you have feedback on a specific service such as Azure Virtual Machines, Web Apps, or SQL Database, please submit your feedback in one of the forums available on the right.

Remember that this site is only for feature suggestions and ideas!

If you have technical questions or need help with Azure, please try StackOverflow or visit our MSDN forums

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Use only a specific RDGW when using WVD

    For these reasons, we want to pin the [rdgateway-r0.wvd.microsoft.com] endpoint to a specific server.

    ・ Compliance
    ・ Charges are incurred for accessing different regions

    Although it is recognized that the operation of Traffic Manager is selected from a plurality of endpoints, it is desirable that it can be fixed by parameters or the like.

    315 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Within Azure AD Devices-All Devices, Make "Download" an option

    When creating Conditional Access policies it is impossible to get a report from Azure or PowerShell that list all devices that are in a "Pending" state in the Registered column.
    There should be an option to download everything in Azure AD Devices-All Devices to a csv file and include the device ID and the Registered state. This would help to find all devices that would fail Conditional Access policies requiring a registered device be used.

    42 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Additional "/read" permission to allow call to Network Watcher queryFlowLogStatus api

    Today default Build-In Reader role not allow to execute Query Flow Log Status, because Reader role allows all operations of "*/read".
    But query flow log status operation have "/action" in the end:
    Microsoft.Network/networkWatchers/queryFlowLogStatus/action

    This makes complicated to use different applications and services which want to query flow log status. To be able to do it they ask customers to create custom role in each and each subscription with that permission and then assign that role to the application (In addition to Reader role which they ask to assign for other features).

    If will be additional permission with "/read" operation to…

    34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Azure SQL PiTR - Option to disable or set to 1 day retention

    We currently have an SQL managed database, which we use for development purposes.

    We are developing how our data ingest will work, currently we drop the tables every day, and re-load all the data. As of the 31-AUG we started getting charged for PiTR which we didn't know about, until PiTR started costing us upwards of $120 per day.

    What I found out is after the initial backup (free) any changes were replicated to 6 regions (GRS storage) and set to 35 days retention period. These are backups we don't want or need, as data is ingested from the Datalake.…

    42 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Update New-AzContainerGroup to allow multiple containers in ACI

    In AZ CLI you can specify a yaml file containing multiple images when deploying an Azure Container Instance.

    This functionality should be made available using Azure Powershell, as it would be useful for writing lightweight deployment scripts in Azure Functions or even Automation. Currently New-AzContainerGroup can only be used to create single-container ACI resources.

    27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Azure Policy

    When we apply Azure Policy to the SQL DB created through stored procedure, the Policy is not triggering its effect on that resource as these resources are not created in ARM layer. We know that policy evaluation happens on the ARM layer. But it would be great if Policy team could add this feature in the Policy so that Policy evaluation happens on the resources created through stored procedure as well.

    18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Application Gateway handling the Query parameter on back-end

    In application gateway HTTP settings when we use "override back-end path" option, it is stripping out the query parameter and retains only the resource path.

    Eg: https://<<HostName>>:443/resurcepath/invoke?api-version=2016-10-01&number=5

    It retains only "https://<<HostName>>:443/resurcepath/invoke" and ignoring "?api-version=2016-10-01&number=5"

    It will be good to retain the query parameters without doing any URL redirection etc

    28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Show ticket number in approval screen

    When requesting a PIM role, you are asked for a ticket number which is then displayed in the audit log. This ticket number should be displayed to the user who is approving the request so they can validate the request

    16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Upgrade CPUs in Azure App Service Premium Tier

    Currently the "Premium" tier on App Service offers this three options:

    P1: 1VCore DSV2
    P2: 2VCores DSv2
    P3: 4VCores DSv2

    I wouldn't call this a premium tier now that we are getting into 2020...

    App service is one of the most useful services offered in Azure and it really needs an upgrade.

    Amazon's Beanstalk does not have such limitations.

    I would suggest that to upgrade the hardware/resources of the Premium tier to at least:

    P1: 2 VCores
    P2: 4 VCores
    P3: 8 VCores

    The processors model should be upgraded as well to use DSv3 or even better the F series.

    30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Fully private App Gateway v2

    From: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/migrate-v1-v2

    " v2 gateways currently don't support only private IP addresses."

    We need to be able to create fully private App Gateway V2, without public IP.

    At the moment V2 Gateways will be public facing so we need to stick with V1. We cannot rely on NSG/Firewall to restrict traffic: we need to be able to provision a private load balancer.

    32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. OS selection screen when creating a new virtual machine in the Azure portal

    In the OS selection screen when creating a new virtual machine in the Azure portal, two identical notations are displayed side by side for each OS version.

    The investigation revealed that the top is a first generation virtual machine and the bottom is a second generation virtual machine.

    We need to make improvements so that we can immediately determine if a virtual machine is a first-generation virtual machine or a second-generation virtual machine.

    The actual screen is attached.

    15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Security Center workflow automation should be linked to management groups

    When using workflow automation in Azure Security Center, you need to associate a workflow (logic app) to a subscription.
    But I have alot of subscriptions and new ones added every day.
    I want a logic app to be run automatically when a threat is detected on multiple subscriptions. (I mean the logic to be associated to multiple subs)

    So, I would argue to associate a workflow automation to a Management Group, so all subscriptions in that MG is associated with that workflow and will be run on threats detected on all subs in that MG. (which can of course also…

    16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Ability to setup daily budget alert on my subscription consumption

    In addition to monthly budget, I would like to be able to set an alert on a daily consumption in order to react immediately and take corrective action to stay in my monthly budget.

    14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Get-AzVM does not return the correct ComputerName from the console if the host name was changed

    In the VM portal the Computer Name is taken from the host name of the machine.

    If you update the host name, the portal will reflect this under "Computer Name" - but querying this via Get-AzVM does not update, if you use OSProfile.ComputerName it still uses the old name

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. To all Employees of Enterprise Accounts - your personal phone is needed for company use

    For companies with Enterprise subscriptions they are being forced to ask their employees to use THEIR OWN PERSONAL PHONES to authenticate this App. If you do not you will lose your cloud data - a form of extortion. One alternative suggested was for employees to request the company purchase a phone for them to do this authentication. Can you imagine the additional expense if everyone did this? I'm a stock holder in this company and don't want poor designs from external apps to cause additional unexpected expenses. This design was not thought through as far as the impact to enterprise…

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Managed IT services Cloud Services IT support & helpdesk Cyber security Custom Software

    Managed IT services
    Cloud Services
    IT support & helpdesk
    Cyber security
    Custom Software

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Allow for blueprint access on management groups without seeing all other subscriptions beneath it

    We want to give access to blueprints on management groups without the user seeing all other subscription below that management group.

    12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Sign-In Risk Policy > MFA > Add an Exclude App and a way to mark and IP safe for unfamiliar locations

    We are having issues with our Sign-In Risk Policy set to Low to action MFA. If our location switches egressing IP addresses, the entire location and users within that location are hit with a low risk for unfamiliar location.

    We do not have the ability to mark an IP safe within this policy, or to exclude a specific app from this policy. Can we have a feature request to add an app exclusion within the Sign-In Risk Policy and the ability to add IP addresses within the unfamiliar locations to be marked as safe to stop MFA triggering on our…

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Allow customers to remove enterprise apps from their tenant so they can delete the tenant themselves.

    Right now, if you have certain enterprise apps added to your tenant in azure, you will not be able to delete them from the tenant so you can delete the tenant itself. It requires a convoluted process through the product group to get them deleted. We would like to be able to clean up our own test tenants and delete them at our leisure without having to go through this long drawn out process.

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Peering Cost prevents some freedom in design

    Several times when proposing a customer utilize an "empty hub" as a starting point in what will grow over time, the cost affiliated with the peering causes some push back.

    My suggestion is to remove the cost associated with Peering within a region, Global peering I wouldn't expect be free. Typically the hosts in a hub / spoke config communicates within 1 vNet or to a Hybrid endpoint, that already incur egress charges from the GW

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 63 64
  • Don't see your idea?

(General Feedback)

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base