I am getting the error "The deployment parameters are using case sensitive names."

Parameter names being changed to all lower case has not rectified the problem.

The ability to create alerts, based on custom metrics would be very useful.
In my use case I'd like to create alerts from Telegraf metrics and apply it to all VMs in my subscription.

I've been looking at the template documentation, but can't seem to find any reference to custom metrics.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/azure-monitor/platform/alerts-metric-create-templates

We have a way to programmatically create a sub, also provide one for deleting programmatically, ofcourse after warning in no uncertain terms that this is going to be destructive and all resources will be lost forever irrevevocably and verifying that is indeed the customer wants, before the actual deletion.

Being able to see who submitted a deployment would be HIGHLY useful. Both for tracking from a security point of view, but also from a costing point of view. If someone isn't putting in required costing tags, we need to be able to go back and ask them, but if we don't know who it was...

I remember there being a way to see who submitted a deployment in a Resource Group, under deployments. However this doesn't appear to be there any longer, or it never was and I am imagining it.

If a template doesn't have a closing } bracket I've had Test-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment report that a parameter passed to it was not found even though it was defined properly in the template.

This misleading error message leads to wasted time. Perhaps we could have Test-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment test for valid JSON first and report back if it's invalid.

AWS has a Certificate Manager service that can easily provision, manage, and deploy public and private SSL/TLS certificates for use with AWS services.

https://aws.amazon.com/certificate-manager/

It would be great if Azure can provide similar service so that customers don't have to buy and bring their own ssl certificates when using Azure services.

I am aware that Azure CDN supports custom domains and it can automatically provision a custom ssl certificate for that domain for free. But you can't do similar things on Application Gateway, or Azure Web Apps, etc.

[functions] Allow copy in user-defined function

This would really help reduce the redundant lines of code. Use case, for a given VM, would like to have multiple drives (i.e. each drive would consists of set of data disk, type and size)

Example

Dive D : 127GiB, premium, 5

Drive E : 255GiB, Standard, 10

Also, this would enables nested loop indirectly, which would be a huge win

[functions] Allow copy in user-defined function

This would really help reduce the redundant lines of code. Use case, for a given VM, would like to have multiple drives (i.e. each drive would consists of set of data disk, type and size)

Example

Dive D : 127GiB, premium, 5

Drive E : 255GiB, Standard, 10

Also, this would enables nested loop indirectly, which would be a huge win

[functions] Allow copy in user-defined function

This would really help reduce the redundant lines of code. Use case, for a given VM, would like to have multiple drives (i.e. each drive would consists of set of data disk, type and size)

Example

Dive D : 127GiB, premium, 5

Drive E : 255GiB, Standard, 10

Also, this would enables nested loop indirectly, which would be a huge win

[functions] Allow copy in user-defined function

This would really help reduce the redundant lines of code. Use case, for a given VM, would like to have multiple drives (i.e. each drive would consists of set of data disk, type and size)

Example

Dive D : 127GiB, premium, 5

Drive E : 255GiB, Standard, 10

Also, this would enables nested loop indirectly, which would be a huge win

I think that JSON is just the most standard way of sending data to the server, and not XML. Also using a custom .bot file for the bot framework does not allow intellisense in VS Code, while a JSON file can (package.json and tsconfig.json being great examples)

It would be nice if there is an option to send the recommendation PDF/CSV every week or month by mail.

It would be nice if the unattached and unassigned resources are also in the overview of Azure Advisor.

We have dozens of subscriptions and resources so an overview would be nice.

With the limit for RBAC Role assignment at 2000, the number of role per resource groups can be attained relatively quickly with larger deployments. I was thinking of 2 ways to bypass the issue, either allow us to increase the limit to Role Assignments in a subscriptions or allow us to do resource group nesting. That way we could apply the roles to the main resource group to use inheritance instead of using multiple role assignments for all the similar resources.

Currently bool() only accepts 1, 0 "true", "false".

It would be very useful to evaluate
- all integers above 1 as true
- all empty strings, arrays or objects as false
- all non-empty strings, arrays or objects as true (except the special string "false")

After us set lock when you create a lock on a resource (ex. Resource Group) and you need to delete or modify it, you must first remove the lock and then re-create it again.
To avoid this effort , I propose to introduce the suspension of the lock (also based on timer) to be rehabilitated once the activity has ended.

Allow to Set spending Limit via ARM Template or Powershell or Rest.
We want to allow to create Azure Subscriptions via an external portal. We to automate the creation of subscriptions.
Include features should be :
-Set Owners
-Set Spending Limit
-Set Currency
-Set Warning Levels
S

It is not possible today to filter the application of an ARM policy based on Azure AD user/group. It would useful to apply policies to a certain subset of users, especially in a CSP scenario.

The only way to accomplish this currently is to first disassociate the offending policy, make the change, then reassign the policy. The challenge with this solution is the possibility that another user with sufficient rights might also be attempting a deployment at the exact moment you disassociate the policy. If that deployment would have been prevented by the policy, then the control would be bypassed.

In the Resource Locks view (for the subscription), it would be helpful to have the object name shown
In the current state, I have no way to know what the lock refers to, except if I use some sort of naming convention

Azure Resources can be deployed on subscription or resource group level, but not on management group level.
My particular use case is the deployment of Policy Definitions & Assignments using ARM Templates. While the deployment succeeds, it's not possible to define a management group as the deployment scope. As a result, the policy definition has the subscription assigned as scope and cannot be assigned on a management group level.
The API version 2018-05-01 supports the argument "managementGroupId". https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/resources/policydefinitions/createorupdateatmanagementgroup