We made application that uses Managed Service Identity.
It's easy and friendly way to access Azure Key Vault that contains some secrets.
Actually, Azure Batch is not support Managed Service Identity.
In this situation, We have to make another application between MSI enabled environment (Azure VM, Web Apps) and disabled environment (Azure Batch).
We don't want writing secrets in application package, environment variables and clear text configuration.
We want strongly Managed Service Identity in Azure Batch.333 votes
We appreciate everyone’s patience in this feature ask. There was quite a bit of complexity across different teams that needed to be resolved before we could begin. Although we have no ETA to share at this time, implementation of this feature has begun.
It would be helpful for azure batch to have encryption at rest for a layer of protection for task temporary files.
The discussion here illustrates it's overly tricky:14 votes
Add support for high priority VMs in the M series. We require over 1TB of ram for a regular task at times, you currently have no VM (that cam't be preempted) that had this capability.
Please add one, RAM requirements are only going up as the data grows and our problem is not embarrassingly parallel, so adding more machines adds both a time and financial cost (inter-node communication) that we do not want to incur.3 votes
The idea I have in mind is to use Azure Batch to export a >100 TB Azure Table, at a much faster rate than Azure Data Factory can manage.
Azure Tables is quoted to cope with 10,000s of simultaneous requests. To maximize my dev velocity, I would create millions of lightweight tasks and let Azure Batch runtime handle all the scheduling details.
But there is a limit of 4 concurrent tasks per core so this would make for extremely underutilized nodes and long runtime.2 votes
If the managed resources for a vm image are missing or the node type doesnt support a requested feature (e.g. managed disk on A series vm) then the pool keeps trying to add nodes eventually hitting resize timeout, after timeout it starts again. Its not easy to debug those situations and a better error report would be very useful.1 vote
- Don't see your idea?