[DocumentDB] Allow Paging (skip/take)
Allowing paging would be huge. Btw, Thank You for rolling out this feature at all! It looks wonderful! Can't wait to try it! However, I won't be able to use it for actual work projects until it supports paging and sorting.
We are working on some foundational pieces which will light up skip/take in future.
More than 4 years with this as the top suggestion. And now more than 6 month "planning it"...
You're a f u c k i n g gang of incompetents!
You're wasting out time miserabily, promising things and lasting forever to deliver them...
come on guys its been years.... we need skip/take
Leng Yang commented
Paging (skip/take) is a required feature for hundreds of millions of rows. Any roadmap when this feature will be added.
Nick Chapsas commented
In the meantime, you could use Cosmonaut which supports PageSize/PageNumber pagination, integrate and then when native support is added the library will be updated as well. You can read more about it here: https://github.com/Elfocrash/Cosmonaut#pagination
We will work towards moving our platform to Cosmos once this feature is added.
Anthony BOUQUET commented
I need some updates too. paging is mandatory in our use case and we won't go on cosmo db until it will be featured.
Ezequiel Ramos commented
Lajos Marton commented
Finally, it will worth the money.
At this time, I can say we are working on some foundational pieces which will light up skip/take in future.
Without skip. I will not even bother with docdb. Its an absolutely essential thing. It seems funny to me it is not yet implemented. Must be difficult to achieve for some reason.
It’s interesting to note CosmosDB is promoted as a MonogDB compatible api yet skip is support on MongoDB and we seem to be getting nowhere quickly
Jason Kergosien commented
I have to agree with everyone. It's a big deal.
Even if it's not a typical NoSQL feature, it doesn't matter. I'm a convert to NoSQL thanks to Cosmos, but since I'm used to very good functionality with RDBMS, guess what, I expect a lot.
(You can only blame yourself (MS). You spoiled us with great features w/SQL Server :) )
Adoption has got to be a key metric for Cosmos, so this should be important to add.
My 2 cents. Thanks guys!
Update us on this, thank you
Pravin Kadam commented
Any Updates on this?
Hi, still no update to SKIP support ?
Hello, any update on this?
It's been 3.25 years. How long does it take to implement this? We want to switch from RavenDB, but CosmosDB just has too many limitations.
Rob Teixeira commented
Seriously? Still no update to this in over a year? Lack of Skip just torpedoed Cosmos DB for my project. Back to SQL Azure...
Justin Staffer commented
Skip is a big deal for us. LINQ is too slow and we would need to pull a ton of data. Please correct me if I'm wrong.