Azure Search

Azure Search is a search-as-a-service solution that allows developers to incorporate a sophisticated search experience into web and mobile applications without having to worry about the complexities of full-text search and without having to deploy, maintain or manage any infrastructure

How can we improve Azure Search?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Support hierarchical facets

    Searching in a hierarchy is very common.
    E.g. Cars/Ford/Accessories

    289 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Support case-insensitive comparison in filters

      Searching with text=<xyz> performs a case-insensitive search. However, testing string fields in filters is case-sensitive. There should be a way to do a case-insensitive string comparison in filter expressions.

      235 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Case-insensitive sorting for string fields

        When querying the index, is it possible to do a case-insensitive $orderby on a string field? For example, we want to sort results by username but preserve the user's choice of casing. While we could workaround this by keeping a normalized version of the username alongside the original data, having this feature built-in would obviously be preferable.

        214 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Search multiple indexes at once

          The underlying elasticsearch technology supports making a single search query that searches and ranks results over multiple disparate indexes at once[1], but this functionality is not surfaced through the Azure Search APIs.

          Adding this would allow a single search to span over indexes with different schemas combined in a single correctly ordered result set.

          [1]: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/multi-index.html

          148 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Add support for field collapsing

            I've utilized field collapsing (aka result grouping) quite a bit utilizing Solr. Being able to group results together by a common element, then being able to page and sort based on that result list.

            97 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              2 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Support 'skip' in facet queries

              Currently the results of facet queries can be limited adding the "count:n" parameter to select only the top n results.
              If one is interested in seeing all results of a facet query, there is no other way than setting the 'count' value sufficiently high to make sure that all result are included in the response.
              In the scenario of a large number of distinct values for the facet field those queries may, however, result in a large response with poor performance.
              In order to be able to provide paging through facet results for better performance, it's necessary to have a…

              78 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • Support custom dictionary

                Some domestic senario like, Legal, really domestic topic require custome dictionary for more accurate wordbreaking, stemming and normalization. I think custome dictionary with easy maintemance like SharePoint or FAST provide today is help this type of senario.

                65 votes
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  5 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Support Explain API

                  The explain api computes a score explanation for a query and a specific document. This can give useful feedback whether a document matches or didn’t match a specific query.

                  59 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    2 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Allow handling spelling errors in search "Did you mean ''?"

                    It would be really nice to have spell check and auto correct as part of search.

                    59 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      I agree to the terms of service
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • Sort results by rank

                      We had also requested sort results by rank

                      51 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        I agree to the terms of service
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Support geo.distance in select result

                        Azure Search does not support returning the distance data from geo.distance in search results. geo.distance can be used in only filter and orderby.

                        I would like to get distance data from geo.distance.

                        46 votes
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          I agree to the terms of service
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • Improve collection matching expressions

                          Currently, collection matching only supports simple equality for the 'any' option and inequality for the 'all' option.

                          I would like to be able match a collection against a set of values instead of testing a single match individually and then combining the results as shown below

                          $filter=tags/any(t: t eq 'x') and tags/any(t: t eq 'y')

                          Additionally, it would also be useful to have the capabilities to include simple boolean logic within the lambda to craft expressions that match a collection item against slightly more complex logic for example:

                          $filter=tags/any(t: t eq 'x' or t eq 'y')

                          43 votes
                          Vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            I agree to the terms of service
                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                            under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Add OData syntax support for startswith, contains, and endswith queries

                            This is essentially a duplicate of another suggestion: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263029-azure-search/suggestions/6470849

                            The original suggestion mentioned odata support, and while it was marked as complete, it was only added to lucene searches.

                            I'm sure many of the 178 votes where for specifically odata support.

                            40 votes
                            Vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              I agree to the terms of service
                              Signed in as (Sign out)
                              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                              1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                            • Provide ability of collection Type field to be searched against individual values separately

                              For a document, where there are multiple values in its collection type column, it gives it lesser score (and hence either to come lower or may not even come in the result) to it even though the search query has matched with ONE of the values in the list COMPLETELY.

                              This is because, currently Azure Search considers list of all the values provided in the collection type as a single string by concatenating all of them.
                              My requirement is that if the search query (for that field) matches with any of the values in the collection, it should consider it…

                              26 votes
                              Vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                I agree to the terms of service
                                Signed in as (Sign out)
                                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              • 26 votes
                                Vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  I agree to the terms of service
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                  1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                • Improve Faceting accuracy by having an option to count all records

                                  For fields that have a large distinct value diversity, the faceting feature gives inaccurate results unless the count parameter is set to a number greater than the number of distinct values in a field. There should be an option in an index field that indicates to the search engine to count and facet all the values in a column. I realize this would hurt performance so it should be optional. But sometimes accuracy is more important than raw performance for consumers of your service.

                                  25 votes
                                  Vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    I agree to the terms of service
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Disable or replace TF-IDF for relevance computing

                                    (Posting on behalf of Xu Lan)

                                    To fit the needs of our search application, we would like to change the relevance computing by disabling or replacing TF-IDF.
                                    Elasticsearch provides a mechanism to ignore TF-IDF: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/ignoring-tfidf.html#ignoring-tfidf.

                                    19 votes
                                    Vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      I agree to the terms of service
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                      0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • Provide option to facet on all facetable fields in a Search request

                                      Some applications can have a large number of facets and it is inconvenient to have to specify them all explicitly in the Search API, as reported here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28542665/azure-search-what-if-i-have-a-lot-of-facets

                                      If there were an option like facet=* that returned facets on all facetable fields, that would be easier for such cases.

                                      12 votes
                                      Vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        I agree to the terms of service
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                        0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • Return partial match for highlights

                                        Currently the highlight option return full word even if there was a partial match with the query text.

                                        For example for search text ‘gupt* ashgu*’ we get ‘Gupta’ and ‘ashgupta’ as the highlights. Instead it would be good to have only the matching parts to be highlighted so that user knows why those suggestions are being surfaced.

                                        "highlights":{
                                        "displayName":[
                                        "Ashish <em>Gupta</em> (WP)"],
                                        "mailNickname":[
                                        "<em>ashgupta</em>"]
                                        }

                                        Simple user scenario is, when user searches for ‘ashgu’ and we currently return top result as "Ashish Gupta, 'ashgupta’".

                                        The expected user experience is to show "Ashish Gupta, 'ashgu'pta", ie the exact things that matched…

                                        10 votes
                                        Vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          I agree to the terms of service
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                          under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Provide sum and average on facet

                                          It would be nice to have agregation on certain facetable Field.
                                          We would define another numeric field to be computed.

                                          On the FacetResult, we could get sum and average exactly in the same way as count.

                                          10 votes
                                          Vote
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            I agree to the terms of service
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                            0 comments  ·  Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          ← Previous 1
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base