Azure Pack

Do you have an idea or suggestion based on your experience with Azure Pack ? We would love to hear it! Please take a few minutes to submit your ideas about providing Azure technologies and services on-premises, or vote up an idea submitted by another customer. All of the feedback you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building Azure Pack. Remember that this site is only for feature suggestions and ideas!

For further reading on Azure Pack, please see our TechNet Documentation and our Wiki (links to articles and blogs). If you have technical questions or need help with Azure Pack, please try our Discussion Forum.

Follow what’s happening from Microsoft in the Cloud:
@Azure, @MSCloud, @InTheCloudMSFT

The latest on Azure Pack:
#WAPack

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Single pane of glass. Manage Azure subscribtions from Azure Pack and reverse

    Not with an additional resource provider, but merge the entries in the same portal.

    301 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great feedback, and something we will be looking into. We appreciate any continued feedback and further suggestions on this topic!

  2. Translate to other languages

    Include other languages, such as PT-PT, or document a way to extend the base product with other translations.

    35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Choice of datacenter

    If tenant resources are spread across multiple datacenters, there should be a choice of datacenter as a unit of organization.

    16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! We too would love to bring this Azure-consistent functionality on-premise.

  4. Update the Azure Pack for Windows to use new UI

    The portal preview should also have an accompanied update for the Azure Pack for windows.

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Ability to develop resource providers that depend on other existing resource providers (whether built-in or custom made)

    Ability to develop resource providers that depend on other existing resource providers (whether built-in or custom made) so they can be visible/selectable when dependent resource provider is selected

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Only allow user from tenant site create VM using Request Management function

    I found something interesting about VM creation and request management(using Gridpro software):
    For example, if a user has a subscription and this subscription has VM clouds service, then this user can bypass request process and go directly create VM from the menu at the left bottom.
    Is there a way that we can prevent user to create VM through this and only allow user to create VM through request process ?
    I suggest Microsoft provide a function that admin can hide the menu for tenant users. therefore, user can only create VM through request management function only.

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Portal and API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! One workaround would be to setup a script that runs on the SPF event to intervene with the VM creation when it comes from the portal, but we plan to review the idea of hiding these elements from the Tenant UIs or in some other way helping you to achieve this scenario.

  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base