Azure Pack

Do you have an idea or suggestion based on your experience with Azure Pack ? We would love to hear it! Please take a few minutes to submit your ideas about providing Azure technologies and services on-premises, or vote up an idea submitted by another customer. All of the feedback you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building Azure Pack. Remember that this site is only for feature suggestions and ideas!

For further reading on Azure Pack, please see our TechNet Documentation and our Wiki (links to articles and blogs). If you have technical questions or need help with Azure Pack, please try our Discussion Forum.

Follow what’s happening from Microsoft in the Cloud:
@Azure, @MSCloud, @InTheCloudMSFT

The latest on Azure Pack:
#WAPack

How can we improve Azure Pack?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

  1. Better Documentation

    43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  2. Manage AzurePack from VisualStudio Server Explorer (Like Azure)

    To be able to manage individual services in Azure Pack via the Server Explorer in Visual Studio just as if it was like the public Azure solution.

    37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  3. Clarify error messages

    Debugging Azure Pack services can be a huge pain because error messages are:

    1: top level messages
    2: global stack traces

    If errors are *more specific it would be easier to debug and would save me a lot of time on the azurepack forums

    16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Rupi Sureshkumar responded

    This is very helpful feedback, we definitely want you to have as seamless experience as possible when using Azure Pack. Could you provide some examples of any error messages that were particularly cryptic or hard to debug for you?

  4. Simplify deployment of Azure pack into one unified deployment package

    Deploying Azure Pack can be combersome using the current installation process. It requires multiple VMs or servers, SQL, pieces of Orchestrator, and so on. I recommend simplifying the deployment process of WAP.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  5. Improve scaling of Azure Pack

    Allow Azure pack to manage more resources across multiple datacenters. Having multiple Azure Pack deployments breaks the cloud paradigm.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  6. Allow the option to pick certificates and dns names for portal urls during installation instead of having to do it afterwards.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  7. Friendly Logging in the WAP UI

    Please update the UI for more friendly logging. Would be great to have the following: A more concise view, similar to Windows server event log UI with filters, etc. but within the WAP UI. A CSV(etc.) export function would be helpful (with filters applied of course). Holistic, segmented logging, i.e. see multiple components in the WAP logging UI, color-code the different component source providers and have the ability to set the refresh and filters. Maybe allowing an extension to write third-party log info into the UI from the application via system center or windows server nodes. As more IT Pros…

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Rupi Sureshkumar responded

    Thanks for the feedback! We are working to improve how we log and present information to the user. These suggestions are helpful and we would like to hear more if you have them!

  8. Provide load balancing information during installation/configuration

    Provide load balancing information during installation/configuration

    Currently, the only way to configure load balancing of components with an external load balancer in Azure Pack is to use Powershell only after WAP installation and configuration. It would be great to specify FQDNs and URI's during the config phase and would be even greater to be able to specify ports.

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Setup and Configuration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Rupi Sureshkumar responded

    Thank you for the suggestion. We will look into improving the configuration experience for WAP and adding these options.

  • Don't see your idea?

Azure Pack

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)
Hosted by UserVoice