Networking

The Networking forum covers all aspects of Networking in Azure, including endpoints, load-balancing, network security, DNS, Traffic Manager, virtual networks, and external connectivity.

Virtual Network:

  • Service overview

  • Technical documentation

  • Pricing details
  • Traffic Manager:

  • Service overview

  • Technical documentation

  • Pricing details
  • Network Watcher:

  • Service overview

  • Technical documentation

  • Pricing details
  • If you have any feedback on any aspect of Azure relating to Networking, we’d love to hear it.

    • Hot ideas
    • Top ideas
    • New ideas
    • My feedback
    1. Support Azure Traffic Manager endpoints that are nested and external to allow us to use alias records

      We have an Apex domain that needs to point to Traffic Manager. We use Traffic Manager nested profiles.
      We want to use alias records to point to our DNS alias record to Traffic manager. This requires using external endpoints in traffic manager.
      Problem is that we use nested profiles. It is not possible to create nested external endpoints in traffic manager.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      1 comment  ·  DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    2. I would like a probe for load balancers that uses the status of a DSC from an automation account

      I would like a probe for load balancers that uses the status of a DSC from an automation account. That way, when a VM is reimaged in a scaleset, it is unavailable to traffic until the DSC shows Compliant.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    3. Support Longest Prefix Match in VNet Peering

      Allow VNet Peering between two VNets that may have overlapped IPs by supporting Longest Prefix Match in routing.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      1 comment  ·  Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    4. User / Group based Firewall Rules

      To move existing Webservices to Azure (Linux Webservers with internal Services) i would like to place them behind an Azure Firewall with Path Through Authentication against Azure AD, so that employees have access to the Ressource and any other access is blocked.I want to create Rules based on users not on IP-Addresses.

      Regards,
      Reiner

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Firewall  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    5. Azure WAF v2 is not recognized by Azure Security Center as security solution and it has not mentioned anywhere.

      Azure WAF v2 is not recognized by Azure Security Center as a security solution and it has not mentioned anywhere. The details that are provided is not enough to understand that it is not being recognized as below.

      Partner solution name: Application Gateway

      Type: Saas-based Web Application Firewall
      Integration mode: Semi-automatically provisioned
      Status : Not reported

      Status has never been reported to Azure Security Center. Usually this means that this security solution isn't configured yet. It is recommended you login to the security solution management console to finalize the initial configuration

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    6. Allow update of TCP timeout for frontend private IPs in Azure application gateway

      Please allow support of updating TCP timeout for private IPs.

      At the moment the TCP Timeout value is available only for public IPs. Would like it to be available for private IPs as well.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    7. Please provide an option to monitor CPU performance of the application gateway at the portal level.

      Please provide an option to monitor CPU performance of the application gateway at the portal level. Since we are not aware of how much CPU is used of the backend instances.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    8. Provide ability to enforce baseline rules across Azure tenant for Azure Front Door WAF

      Providing the ability to define a baseline set of rules for Azure Front Door WAF will help enterprise security teams keep a consistent security posture for endpoints no matter who owns the deployment of the Azure Front Door instance. Ideally this could be configured to enforce this baseline across all Azure Front Door instances within an Azure tenant.

      4 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      1 comment  ·  Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    9. add source port for every conversation in Traffic Analytics dashboard

      Currently sessions are summarized for source IP to desination IP+port. There is source port missing in that schema which would allow for recognition of separate conversations to the same client+service pair.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    10. Add functionality to Application Gateway for routing based on HTTP headers

      The ability to route traffic to backend pools depending on HTTP headers would be much appreciated. At the moment the only way to do this is with a function app.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    11. Cisco Meraki - 15x Code - IKEv2 - Certify Device on Azure List

      With Cisco Meraki's MX code release of 15.x, IKEv2 is now supported - Can we get the Cisco Meraki MX as certified for an Azure VPN Device?

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    12. Could we add service tag about specific country like Singapore for Network Security Group?

      Could we add service tag about specific country like Singapore for Network Security Group?

      We have some service tag for NSG like internet/ Virtual network.
      Since we have some feedback that customer need allow/block traffic from specific country for security reason.

      Please advise.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    13. show destination public IPs in Traffic Analytics

      Currently, there is summarization done for destination public IPs and only destination region is visible in Traffic Analytics. Sessions to different public IPs are not separated in the dashboard, hence summary outgoing volume can be viewed only.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    14. provisioning a certificate should not take hours

      there isn't much to it. when a domain change or when moving an app to azure we're forced to set up the cname first and then the endpoint https next, so that users are immediately redirected to the endpoint but the endpoint won't serve it's proper certificate until 6+ hours later.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    15. Static public outbound IP for Application Gateway v1

      We use Application Gateway v1 because it has the possibility to assign a static private frontend IP.
      Now we would love to see the possibility to assign a static public IP for outbound traffic.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    16. Increase the hard limit of allowed advertised routes for IPSec tunnels over BGP.

      I am dealing with a very complex client network environment, which is managed by their vendor.

      The current route advertisement limit is severely impacting the works that we need to perform through to, and within the client's network.

      I would like to request, and strongly suggest for an increase in the hard limit of allowed advertised routes for IPSec tunnels over BGP.

      Please also refer to the case reference number 119051322001294.

      Thank you.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    17. Current CPU Utilization metrics

      We've 502 failed request. Upon raising a ticket with Microsoft support we found that the Instance count was getting heavily utilized. Can you implement CPU Metrics so that we can do the same thing by ourselves.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    18. Be able to configure all aspects of S2S vpn from the MS Azure portal

      It would be helpful to be able to configure all aspects of S2S vpn from the MS Azure portal. We had to do some configuration via the powershell commands, which :
      1: was not intuitive, as the parameters weren't readily shown anywhere
      2: takes a special level of knowledge to be able to do that.

      Once we were able to make the parameters match between our Cisco ASAV on prem, and the Gateway in Azure, then everything worked, but it took some extra time to get there.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    19. Front Door: TM’s FQDN is reflecting in drop down menu mutiple times when adding app services to a front door backend pool

      Currently if i have multiple app services connected to a traffic manager and i want to have a Azure Front door, TM's FQDN reflects in the dropdown while adding these appservices in Front door backend pool.

      For eg. Say xyz.azurewesites.net and pqr.azurewebsites.net are connected to tm.trafficmanager.net. When I create a front door and try to add these appservices to the pool, tm.trafficmanager.net shows up two times instead of real appservice names.

      This is a issue where if I want add app services among multiple backend pools say one for read and one for write, there would be no way to…

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    20. Azure Sign in - IPv6 does not show location

      We set up a conditional access based on Geo location but IPv6 users does not show location. Please fix it so it shows location.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      (thinking…)
      Sign in with: Microsoft
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      triaged  ·  0 comments  ·  IPv6  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Don't see your idea?

    Feedback and Knowledge Base