ACL's for AzureFiles
I've started experimenting with Azure Files. One of the features I'm lacking is the fact that you cannot give access to Folders/Files on AzureFiles based on Active Directory credentials. If you setup a typical fileshare one would like to be able to grant/revoke access to folders and files based on information of users in AD.
Thank you all for the feedback! This is something we are actively developing, and hope to rolling out in a preview in the first half of this year! Stay tuned for more information!
Program Manager, Azure Files
Pete Hall commented
Any news on this? Integration with Azure AD is a must
+1 This feature should be supported.
Shuhei Uda commented
We need you to permit ACL feature for Azure Storage (Blob, Table, Queue, Files).
Since Azure Storage does not have source IP filtering now, it is unusable to save confidential data. (ex. personal information, payment data, security data, etc.)
Azure Storage (Blob, Table, Queue, Files) でアクセス制限を可能にしてほしい。
Ingram Leedy commented
+1 yes yes yes
M. Willemsen commented
This would be great! Hope this will be implemented soon.
Teppei Ishii commented
without ACL and quota, Azure Files is only for someone who owns & administors Azure Storage account. This cannot be truely the enterprise capable solution.
Allow AzureAD User access and file permission control with the Storager > File Service > File Shares.
I want to map the file shares directly to end point systems but need to be able to set access permissions.
Jono Walker commented
I would also love this as we could move our EFSS from another provider
Xiaolin An commented
+1 for ACL and quota implementation
Peter Selch Dahl commented
Please see Advisors forum for feedback in regards to this feedback request. I PING Lavanya from the Azure Storage team. We really need this function now. Let's get up the votes!
+1 This will immensely help me remove my aging file server
Gerald Wiltse commented
The market has proven that a good multi-platform sync client like Dropbox is imperative for any modern storage solution. While mapping drives is useful, and works for some use cases, I believe a sync client a logical step in the near future for Azure Files.
Sharepoint online has been the Microsoft cloud file sharing solution for a few years now. However, countless articles and bloggers made it very clear: Sharepoint is a big web front end, which runs on IIS and SQL and WebDAV for file hosting, and will never be the best file sharing platform for this reason.
Azure Files is a platform that has the potential to fill in the gaps left by Sharepoint (and every other cloud-file storage provider for that matter). Because of the proximity to Azure AD and Sharepoint Online, it is uniquely positioned to become a one-of-a-kind file sharing service with fully integrated ACL's based on Azure AD Users and Groups. While that is another feature request entirely, that type of security combined with a sync client would enable Office 365 organizations everywhere (like my clients) to stop fighting with Sharepoint storage on a daily basis for some types of data, and still leverage their very robust pre-existing security group and permission strategy.
Gerald Wiltse commented
Yes, this is the single biggest thing I have been waiting for with Azure Files. It's awesome to be able to mount azure files shares over the internet with SMB 3.0 now, and the security keys are a reasonable security mechanism for server-side mounting, but it's time to add a layer for user-based security, integrated with Azure AD.
Brian “B” Laws commented
Being able to access Azure Files via a UNC would make the service vastly more useful. We could at that point use it like a traditional NAS for accessing common files and for automated processes. Like Eric said, non-interactive services are unable to access the Azure Files shares since they are unable to map the drive (that is, without a lot of complicated configuration). This would enable us to use it as a backup target for SQL Server, SharePoint, etc. Yes, SQL Server backups can write to an Azure Storage account, but this option is not available in Maintenance Plans (at least as of SQL 2012). We could abandon Maintenance Plans but that would require a higher level of complexity and management.
Yes please! I want to remove file servers on-prem and move to a file server as a service where I do not have to manage the server, the storage capacity and the patches.
Or if it is not feasible to utilize Azure AD, at least have the ability to generate unique keys per share.
I have seen a lot of customers ask if Azure Files could be integrated with Azure AD authentication vs the standard Storage Account name/key. With the current model of Azure Files, it would be a security risk to create more than 2 File Shares as we don't have enough unique storage keys for each share.
Jeff Evans commented
+1 - I believe this is mostly because Azure Files is not yet supporting security descriptors. MSFT, please make this happen!
Eric Irestone commented
Azure File Services provide a great opportunity to allow durability and de-duplication for multiple VMs when accessing common files, vs. copying them on each VHD for each VM.
I would like to see that File Services allow for authentication against AD, hosted on a VM in Azure for example, so that my Window Services can access these common files via a UNC path.
This would require the Window Service to run as a specified user in AD allowed to Run as a Service, and if the the Windows Service needed to access a UNC file resource it would not need to provide secondary credentials to access the file. This alleviates the issue of having to use "net use" which has a requirement of needing an Interactive Login for normal use in Windows, or needing to write a custom impersonation wrapper in your Windows Service.