Currently you can use SSL but you have to user the standard URL. You can create a CNAME to your storage account but most browsers complain that the traffic was rerouted and is possibly an attack. There should be a way to install a domain certificate to your containers.

Thise idea is a duplicate of https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217298-storage/suggestions/3007732-make-it-possible-to-use-ssl-on-blob-storage-using, which the Azure Team marked as Completed, because you can accomplish this using CDN. But we need the real thing where you can have read/write SAS links to blob using SSL and Custom Domains.

Support Azure File Storage in the Freebsd based VMs.

Currently it's unable to mount the Azure File Storage in a Freebsed based VM.

Support snapshot or backup feature from Azure backup vault for blob storage including deduplication feature

Today the maximum policy you can have is 5. This is way to low as we are using blob storage in a data sharing scenario between providers and consumers and we need to use policies to be able to revoke issued SAS tokens in this sharing scenario. 5 policies means that we can only control 5 SAS keys that can be revoked. We need a lot more.

At the moment when I view Azure tables I see all the Azure "system" tables, they all appear to begin with "$", e.g. $MetricsCapacityBlob.

Personally I've never ever had need to look at those so it would de-clutter the interface if I had a way of removing them from the list. This could be as simple as an option to hide all tables beginning "$" or I guess you could go further for other scenarios.

Currently if I have millions of documents inside a virtual folder, there is not way to delete them without actually iterating through everything, which is extremely time consuming (weeks to process deletions)

For example, if you have multiple containers, which in turn have multiple virtual folders with millions of blobs, moving, renaming or deleting the "folder" is impossible without some painfully slow iterating through everything.

thanks!

When operating on tables and blobs and something goes wrong, Azure throws a `StorageException`.

`.RequestInformation.ExtendedErrorInformation` will give you a bit of information about what went wrong, such as this when trying to insert a duplicate key into a table:

`The specified entity already exists`

But it doesn't tell you *which* entities the failure relates to. It would be useful for StorageException to include the Partition Key and Row Key of related entities.

When invoking Directory Statistics on deep folder trees - Storage Explorer hangs and has to be killed from process list. The attachment shows the problem.

Please display the created date and last modified date as a column in storage explorer.

This has been requested in other forms, but now that you have Managed Disks you're most of the way there. I would like to be able to say "I want a Managed Disk using standard storage, 1TB in size, with 2500 IOPS." Then you figure out how to configure storage to deliver those IOPS without me having to stripe disks, or whatever.
Or perhaps "I want a 1TB Managed Disk using premium storage with 15000 IOPS." Again, you figure out how to configure and provision that, so I don't have to. That would be awesome!

Momently its not possible to map a azure file storage share via GPO, because the two fields for username and password are greyed out.

Do we have a way to tag specific AD users to be allowed to access a blob? if not when can we expect this feature?

Add a Move button to Storage Explorer, especially for File Shares. This functionality could move a file/folder to another location within the same share.

Hi there,

It would be great if I could do batch insert (add) of messages. Often times I need to add several hundred or thousands or messages to a queue, and today I have to add them one by one. This is also related to the small size limitation of each message.

Windows has a relatively unknown backup API that tools like Robocopy can access if you use the /B flag.

What it means in reality is that a user with SeBackupPrivilege, running in an admin console with a tool like robocopy can copy data without being restricted by NTFS permissions.
For someone that works with File servers every day this would solve a lot of issues.

Currently there is not possible to switch on VT-x on VMs, so installtion on-premises Virtual Server solution are not possible.