Add support for nested groups in Azure AD (app access and provisioning, group-based licensing)
A lot of organizations use nested groups in on-premise AD. Syncronizing these groups to Azure AD have no value today. But the group itself have value on-premise
Creating new group in AD with only users and then synchronize it to Azure AD creates extra administration for administrators and confusion for end-users.
Dynamic Groups in Azure AD as of today don’t have support for “Member Of” or similar hence don’t solve the problem.
Adding nested groups to Azure AD would add a lot of value to Azure AD.
Michael
shared this idea
We’re continuing to investigate options for adding this support. There are technical challenges to overcome in order to make this happen. We thank you for all your valuable comments so far, and welcome any additional feedback you have on what are the most important use cases involved with these scenarios.
135 comments
-
Denis Bogunic
commented
Anyone from the MS teams care to comment?
-
Lukas
commented
We need this Feature ASAP to keep managing Ressources by best practice RBAC group management.
So there are ressource groups nested in role groups. -
Mike Pagán
commented
With best practices generally being use groups in groups for management, it would be helpful if Azure AD would support them also.
-
Anonymous
commented
Has anyone come up with work arounds for this?
-
Anonymous
commented
Is there any news?
-
Vin Latus
commented
As to the question of use cases from October 19th, using local groups to assign permissions has been a best practice recommendation for ages. In my mind it still applies in these Azure AD situations.
-
Anonymous
commented
any news about this topic since october 2018?
-
Rob West
commented
Please, please, please. This seems like a significant design issue. We cannot properly implement Role Based Access for applications without nested group support.
-
Anonymous
commented
please resolve this issue. nesting should have been a day one requirement
-
Vadlamani, Ramesh (RVadlamani)
commented
We are very keen on getting this feature that supports the provisioning of nested groups.
-
Quirijn van Tilburg
commented
We require group nesting for the scenarios where it's not supported. Please add support for those scenarios:
- App role assignment (assigning groups to an app is supported, but groups nested within the directly assigned group will not have access), both for access and for provisioning
- Group-based licensing (assigning a license automatically to all members of a group)
- Office 365 Groups -
Stefano Belluomini
commented
3 years on and still nothing. How is RBAC simply being ignored here? And this is why people haven’t gone cloud native yet.
-
hasitha.dealwis
commented
Added my vote.
-
Tom Brown
commented
Added my vote.
-
Adam Millerchip
commented
Added my vote, why is this not an out the box thing?
-
Baraya, Nawaf
commented
added my vote
-
Jordan
commented
Added my vote, and still don't feel the love since this looks over a year old. On-Prem, we live on Nested Groups.
-
Anonymous
commented
How is this not already fixed? This seems like an absolute no brainer. This reminds me of how Teams Voice doesn't support caller-id pass through. MS thinks 90% working is good enough.
-
Anonymous
commented
Please add this feature.
-
Anonymous
commented
Really need this feature in our environment.