Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Azure Active Directory

Welcome to the Azure Active Directory suggestions and feedback site! We love hearing from you. If you have suggestions, please submit an idea or vote up an idea. We are monitoring the site actively.

Thank you for joining our community and helping improve Azure AD!

Wehave a new log in experience integrated with Azure AD, and we stronglyrecommend you log in with your Azure AD (Office 365) account. If yourUserVoice account is the same email address as your Azure AD account, yourprevious activities will be automatically mapped to your Azure AD account.  You can read more here for details: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Azure-Active-Directory-Identity/Putting-customers-first-for-f...

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Azure AD - SaaS - SCIM provisioning of AD attribute thumbnailPhoto

    Azure AD SCIM Provisioning should allow for the provisioning/mapping of the AD attribute thumbnailPhoto to SaaS applications. This value is already present within Azure.

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  12 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. serviceNow

    I think there is significant area for improvement of the Auto Provisioning functionality when dealing with referenced fields.

    For example, the user table within ServiceNow looks similar to the sample snippet below:

    TABLE - User [sys_user]

    FIELD - Username [username] - string
    FIELD - Name [name] - string
    FIELD - Email [email] - string
    FIELD - Department [department] - references Department [cmn
    department] table
    FIELD - Location [location] - references Location [cmn_location] table
    FIELD - etc. etc.

    Provisioning from Azure - in the cloud - is an awesome alternative to the previous configuration of having ServiceNow communicate with on-prem…

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Support for Salesforce Permission Set Group in the Salesforce Connector

    Would be great to add the support for Salesforce Permission Set Group in the Salesforce Connector.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Allow dynamic permission set assignment in Salesforce provisioning

    Right now AAD supports a "Permission Sets"attribute, however this is not usable. Salesforce users have multiple Permission Sets, which are dependent on their O365 groups. For example, members of the O365 group "IT Services Team" would get the permission set "IT Services" in Salesforce. Until AAD's Salesforce connector supports mapping Permission Sets based on group membership in AAD, most organizations will not be able to use AAD for Salesforce provisioning.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Integrate site mapping for Samanage App

    I am provisioning users from AAD to Samanage and I am trying to map the AD attribute "physicalDeliveryOfficeName" to the Samanage "site" attribute. This mapping is currently not supported and I would find it useful.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Attribute SAMAccountName for the ServiceNow User provisioning

    Would be great to to have in the supported list of attributes in the ServiceNow user provisioning app the attribute SamAccountName. This is important for example for the intgegration of legacy applications like SCCM in ServiceNow asset management. Thanks for your support

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Allow user folder provisioning for Box upon user assignment in Azure ADP

    We made the choice to use Azure AD Premium as the main IdP platform for our organization despite being a newer product in the IdP market space. Unfortunately due to the newness we understand it hasn't quite caught up with others like Okta, etc. as far as being able to extend certain items to the Box cloud space.

    One feature we observed when aligning Okta & Box is that when a user gets assigned or provisioned to the Box Application, they also have the ability to provision a user folder at the time the account is provisioned.

    We would like…

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Azure AD User provisioning service : Adding a Staging/Preview mode

    Please add a Staging/Preview mode for the Azure AD User Provisioning Service.
    It should be possible in an initial setup to test a new provisioning interface and receive a report on what will be changed in an end application. This gives the possibility and security that a new interface can be set up productively.
    There is currently a risk that unwanted changes will be made.
    As a suggestion; extension of the Scope field by
    - Sync all users and groups (Preview only)
    - Sync only assigned users and groups (Preview only)

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Get group membership as an attribute of the user when provisioning with SCIM

    When mapping Azure AD attributes to application attributes, I would to know the group membership in order to set properly the values of the target attributes.

    Imagine the licence is an attribute of the user object. It can be "premium"/"silver"/etc.
    On-premises, in AD, I manage my group membership by adding the user to groups like "MyApplicationPremium", "MyApplicationSilver", etc.
    By leveveraging the group membership in the mapping, I can set the proper licence.
    There is no other way to manage this as I will not have an attribute for each application to hold the licence for instance.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. (Provision null attributes) Add option to have properties be emptied after clearing them in Azure AD

    Right now, I can set a phone number and clear it again in Azure. Azure will update the phonenumber in the application but will never clear it. This is by design I understand that, but our customers would like the option to also clear this information as they consider AAD the source/leading system and it's primary task is to make sure all other applications have the same data, which currently is not the case as the data is never removed from applications after it is removed from AAD

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Support filtering = false | ServiceProviderConfig

    Azure AD SCIM client is not compatible with applications, which do not support "filtering".

    If “filtering” is not supported by 3rd party app, do not ignore that.
    Use the “matching” attribute defined in mappings during the initial cycle to check, if the resource exists.
    If resource exists (HTTP-200), save “ID” persistently.
    Use “ID” in every subsequent request

    cf. RFC7644 section 4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7644#section-4

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Please support Join in provisioning with user groups in Azure AD.

    Please support Join function in provisioning with user groups in Azure AD.

    Excerpt:
    Matching based on a combination of attributes is not supported: Most applications do not support querying based on two properties. Therefore, it is not possible to match based on a combination of attributes. It is possible to evaluate single properties on after another.
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/app-provisioning/customize-application-attributes#matching-users-in-the-source-and-target--systems

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. AAD provisioning does not show Audit logs for group membership

    AAD and G suite provisioning does not show Audit logs for group membership update which is I believe quite important to know. As per MS agent :

    If the user is not provisioned already on G suite, when we try to update group membership, this would obviously fail since we don't have a reference attribute to resolve on the target. Currently, by design, Azure AD doesn't retry the previously failed group membership update after the user is provisioned. Workarounds to fix this problem is to remove and re-add the user as a member of the group or trigger a clear…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. IDCS Provisioning doesn't work

    The Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Gallery app uses OracleIDCS object. But it doesn't support the attribute primary email = boolean. You cannot create a user in IDCS unless you set the email and put it as primary. so essentially, the email.primary has to be set to a boolean(true). Please include it in the OracleIDCS objectclass

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Application Provisioning Attribute Mapping Configuration Backup for last 5 changes

    During recent incident I came to know the Provisioning Configuration changes details does not get backed up. i.e. attribute changes which we make on attribute mapping. Only a text message get recorded the when changes are performed. It never record what changes were made. If Microsoft provide anyone functionality it will be helpful for all Azure customer.

    Option 1) Provide backup for provisioning application schema for the last 5 configuration changes which can be access by Admin. It will help Admin to restore from the backup if incase of any failure while updating the Schema

    Option 2) Currently Microsoft records…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Configurability of SCIM /Groups PATCH Members List Size

    When provisioning via SCIM to Slack, we're seeing only three members per PATCH request with hundreds of concurrent requests, resulting in 429 rate limiting responses. With a significant number of users (10k plus) this becomes a serious problem. We need to increase the number of members per PATCH for AAD SCIM to be a viable provisioning solution.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Support provisioning of User Risk level to SCIM applications

    Support UserRisk level (from Azure Identity protection) as an attribute that can be provisioned via SCIM. Currently, applications that need this info have to use Graph API (which is an overhead when all other attributes are available through SCIM).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. entitlements scim

    In SCIM mapping, there is the missing target attribute "entitlements". However, this attribute is in the core user Schemas and the rfc 7643 says :

    entitlements
    A list of entitlements for the user that represent a thing the
    user has. An entitlement may be an additional right to a thing,
    object, or service. No vocabulary or syntax is specified; service
    providers and clients are expected to encode sufficient
    information in the value so as to accurately and without ambiguity
    determine what the user has access to. This value has no
    canonical types, although a type may be useful as a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Provisioning to Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base